📊 The Final Tick

🔍 Week in Review

Open
7,743.51
Close
7,722.78
Weekly Change
↓ 20.73 (-0.27%)

Our Bearish Friday prediction from Wednesday was incorrect. A Bearish prediction requires the price to close lower than Wednesday's level, but it closed higher.

The Strong Strength prediction was incorrect. A Strong Bearish prediction requires the price to close at least 25 handles lower than Wednesday's close.

📊 Expected Move Analysis

Consecutive Expected Move Touches

Weeks in a row hitting expected move

07
↗
✓

Market insight: Expected move has been touched 7 consecutive weeks, an extraordinary streak that suggests market makers are consistently calibrating volatility correctly.

!

Warning: Historical data shows failing to touch expected move often follow so many consecutive touches.

There are no significant consecutive closes in either the weekly or daily timeframe.

📈 Current SPX-ES Spread: 54.50

Please update your trading indicators accordingly with the new spread

📊 MEGA0DTE Weekly Scorecard

Week of 10/02 — Expected Move Breaches

2
Upper breach
8
Lower breach
6
No breach
AAPL
▼ Lower
NVDA
▲ Upper
TSLA
▼ Lower
MSFT
▼ Lower
GOOGL
— Held
META
▼ Lower
AMZN
— Held
AVGO
— Held
AMD
▼ Lower
INTC
▼ Lower
MU
— Held
XLF
▼ Lower
SMH
▲ Upper
GLD
▼ Lower
XLE
— Held
DRAM
— Held

■ Breached upper EM   ■ Breached lower EM   ■ Within range

⚡ $XLF moved 2.0x its expected move this week (▼ lower breach)
Load MEGA0DTE indicator in ThinkorSwim
Levels refreshed Friday close — new EM ranges inside
Load indicator →

📈 Volatility Analysis

Weekly EM 10/09
96.06
Previous Week: 107.22 ↓ 10.4% lower
4-Week Avg: 106.61 ↓ 9.9% lower
YTD Avg: 124.56 ↓ 22.9% lower
Daily EM 10/05
42.53
20-Day Avg: 47.47 ↓ 10% lower
YTD Avg: 51.42 ↓ 17% lower

What This Means for the Market

The recent stabilization of expected moves represents a short-term equilibrium, but this is occurring within a fundamentally altered volatility landscape. With both weekly and daily expected moves remaining approximately 20% below their YTD averages, the market has established a new baseline rather than returning to historical norms.

  • Market makers have adapted to lower volatility conditions while maintaining tight risk management
  • Institutional positioning has adjusted to accommodate the new normal
  • The consensus view acknowledges lower volatility expectations than historical patterns indicate

These conditions often create a temporary stability within a compressed volatility environment, which can persist until catalysts emerge to either justify the lower expected moves or force a return to historical norms.